
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>Does iPhone for photographic services need FDA approval</title>
<link>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1083278</link>
<description></description>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 09:27:22 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2015 16:13:45 GMT</pubDate>
<copyright>Copyright &#xA9; 2015 Ophthalmic Photographers&apos; Society</copyright>
<atom:link href="https://www.opsweb.org/forums/topic_rss.asp?id=1083278" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link>
<item>
<title>Does iPhone for photographic services need FDA approval</title>
<link>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1083278</link>
<guid>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1083278</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Everyone,</p>
<p>I received another inquiry I am hoping you can assist me with. &nbsp;</p>
<p class="">&lt;Hello, Do you know if an iphone needs a 510(k) FDA approval for it to be used for photographic services billed to Medicare? Can you suggest or reference the applicable Medicare law or rule?</p>
<p class=""><u5:p></u5:p></p>
<p class="">Much appreciate your help! Best regards,<br>
<a href="mailto:alanhome@aol.com">alanhome@aol.com</a>&gt;</p>
<p class="">Please post responses here or feel free to respond directly to 'Alan's emial.</p>
<p class="">Thanks,</p>
<p class="">Barb McCalley</p>
<p class=""><u5:p></u5:p></p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2015 14:57:28 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1134582</link>
<guid>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1134582</guid>
<description><![CDATA[While I'm no Doctor, or Lawyer, my understanding has been that if something is used for medical diagnostics it must be approved by the FDA, particularly if the government is the source of health insurance (medicare/medicaid).  The monkey wrench in that thought: Avastin.<br /><br />The only thing on the FDA website that I could readily find was this PDF regarding the process of a glaucoma imaging device becoming FDA approved.<br /><br />http://www.fda.gov/downloads/medicaldevices/newsevents/workshopsconferences/ucm326755.pdf]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2015 16:52:37 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1134589</link>
<guid>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1134589</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Another search found two helpful links via Emergo.<br /><br />The process for a medical device to become FDA approved is the US FDA 510(k) process.  That process is briefly detailed here:<br /><br />http://www.emergogroup.com/resources/articles/fda-510k-clearance-process<br /><br /><br /><br />The list of medical devices which are 510(k) excempt are here:<br /><br />http://www.emergogroup.com/resources/articles/fda-510k-exempt]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2015 17:11:44 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1134592</link>
<guid>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1134592</guid>
<description><![CDATA[There's a link on that last page from Emergo which is broken, the current site for finding approved and pending-approval for medical devices is here:<br /><br />http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/default.htm<br /><br />It doesn't directly answer the question, but if these other devices doing the same thing require FDA approval that's probably a good sign that the next device will need it too.]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2015 17:13:45 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
