
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>FF450+ Lens Hood</title>
<link>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1455936</link>
<description></description>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 02:09:15 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2018 07:06:09 GMT</pubDate>
<copyright>Copyright &#xA9; 2018 Ophthalmic Photographers&apos; Society</copyright>
<atom:link href="https://www.opsweb.org/forums/topic_rss.asp?id=1455936" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link>
<item>
<title>FF450+ Lens Hood</title>
<link>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1455936</link>
<guid>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1455936</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi ophthalmic imaging experts!</p>
<p>Anyone out there ever experiment with removing the metal lens hood from their FF450?</p>
<p>When going after some of those peripheral lesions it can get in the way and it's far faster to pivot my camera than fiddle with head positioning.&nbsp; [It's all about speed so we can get back to those urgent OCTs!]</p>
<p>I'm wondering most about flare/lens glare issues since the hood does cone down significantly.</p>
<p>I don't like the thought of losing my lens cap, but i'm sure i can macgyver that.</p>
<p>All input appreciated.</p>
<p>j-</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2018 15:19:03 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1455973</link>
<guid>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1455973</guid>
<description><![CDATA[No experience, but please take photos throughout the process and this could be a great topic for the Scientific Session next year!<br />]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2018 17:13:08 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1457255</link>
<guid>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1457255</guid>
<description><![CDATA[We don't have an FF450 and I've not used one so I'm not a ton of help...but some food for thought.<br /><br />It should be easy enough to find a different way to have a lens cap on there, even if it means making a detailed sketch and having a 3D printer burn one out.  <br /><br />Speed is an important thing, the longer it takes to get the photo, the less patient the patient is, and the quality potential for imaging tends to decrease.  <br /><br />Is there a different way to drop the glare?  Overhead lighting being turned off?  Different location for room lighting (under cabinet only during capture vice using overhead)?  using only reflected light during OCT on matte painted walls to reduce polarized light potential?  At the worst if the glare is from external lighting you could drop a sheet over the photographer, camera, and patient and reminisce of the similarity to wet plate collodion photograph capturing processes.  <br /><br /><br />]]></description>
<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2018 08:06:09 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
