
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>Anterion scans - custom vs pre-set</title>
<link>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1739767</link>
<description></description>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 02:09:17 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2023 16:41:32 GMT</pubDate>
<copyright>Copyright &#xA9; 2023 Ophthalmic Photographers&apos; Society</copyright>
<atom:link href="https://www.opsweb.org/forums/topic_rss.asp?id=1739767" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link>
<item>
<title>Anterion scans - custom vs pre-set</title>
<link>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1739767</link>
<guid>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1739767</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi All.</p><p>Quick question, for those of you who have a Heidelberg Anterion.</p><p>Do you tend to use the scans that come with the machine, or make each one unique for the patient or use a set of custom scans you've made?</p><p>I ask as you can seemingly adjust the scans so much, I wonder if it would be easier to stick to a couple of scan types&nbsp;</p><p>We've only had ours a few weeks, and are still coming to grips with all the ins and outs.</p><p>Thanks for any info, Lisa</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Jun 2023 11:53:31 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1742904</link>
<guid>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1742904</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Hi Lisa<br /><br />While we don't have the Anterion, i would agree with your approach to create a minimal basic protocol using some default scans.  This makes it more repeatable and easier if someone has to jump in for you.  If you find something interesting, you can then always augment your protocol with free scanning.<br /><br />hth<br /><br />j-]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2023 17:41:32 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
