
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>Clinic patient throughput</title>
<link>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1773024</link>
<description></description>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 02:16:02 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2024 18:31:09 GMT</pubDate>
<copyright>Copyright &#xA9; 2024 Ophthalmic Photographers&apos; Society</copyright>
<atom:link href="https://www.opsweb.org/forums/topic_rss.asp?id=1773024" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link>
<item>
<title>Clinic patient throughput</title>
<link>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1773024</link>
<guid>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1773024</guid>
<description><![CDATA[In a multi-specialty practice, has anyone done a speed comparison between their favorite spectralis and their favorite cirrus?&nbsp; <br /><br />In particular, thinking of non-retina and non-oncology providers who just need a quick view, has anyone put different OCT's head to head like this?&nbsp; If so, would you please share your insights?]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2024 19:31:09 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
