
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>Konan NonCon Model SP-8800</title>
<link>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1778263</link>
<description></description>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 01:53:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 May 2024 00:35:13 GMT</pubDate>
<copyright>Copyright &#xA9; 2024 Ophthalmic Photographers&apos; Society</copyright>
<atom:link href="https://www.opsweb.org/forums/topic_rss.asp?id=1778263" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link>
<item>
<title>Konan NonCon Model SP-8800</title>
<link>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1778263</link>
<guid>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1778263</guid>
<description><![CDATA[This may be a long shot.&nbsp; Our Konan does central cell counts just fine, has anyone had consistent success with this model getting peripheral cornea cell counts?&nbsp; &nbsp; Looking to see if there's a technique someone might be aware of.<br /><br />This is device, well, uses a P/S 2 port for the mouse if that helps hint at its origination date.]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 2 May 2024 20:41:37 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1778306</link>
<guid>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1778306</guid>
<description><![CDATA[This instrument is designed to be coaxial.  You can get paracentral, but only to the point that the macro allows you to.    For true peripheral corneal thicknesses you could use a Pentacam.    Not sure if the confocal microscopes allow for corneal marginal cell counts<br /><br />Denice Barsness<br />]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 May 2024 01:35:13 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
