
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>Anyone Billing for FAF?</title>
<link>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=377935</link>
<description></description>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 02:07:03 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 16:05:56 GMT</pubDate>
<copyright>Copyright &#xA9; 2012 Ophthalmic Photographers&apos; Society</copyright>
<atom:link href="https://www.opsweb.org/forums/topic_rss.asp?id=377935" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link>
<item>
<title>Anyone Billing for FAF?</title>
<link>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=377935</link>
<guid>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=377935</guid>
<description><![CDATA[If so, what are you billing for? FP - 92250? Also, anyone billing for IR images on the Heidelberg? Thanks!<br>]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 5 Mar 2012 21:07:17 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>faf billing</title>
<link>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=378119</link>
<guid>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=378119</guid>
<description><![CDATA[we put in 92250 for faf images. now whether they get paid for, that's another issue... when i hear something official from someone in revenue, i will change our policy. it's been known to happen before.<div><br></div><div>gary</div>]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 6 Mar 2012 02:37:04 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>92499</title>
<link>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=383107</link>
<guid>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=383107</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<P>We have always used 92250 for FPs and AFs on the Heidelberg.&nbsp; Until last week when we got a new Heidelberg rep and he swears up and down 92499 will work.&nbsp; He also says that we can code 92250 and 92499 on the same visit.&nbsp; We will see.</P>
<P><EM>92250&copy;<BR>Eye exam with photos<BR><BR>Note: Use 92250 only to report photographs obtained with a camera on film or digital media.<BR><BR>92499&copy;<BR>Unlisted ophthalmological service or procedure<BR><BR>Note: Use 92499 to identify fundus images obtained with scanning laser equipment.<BR></EM></P>
<P>~Alecia Travis<BR></P>]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 17:22:45 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=384575</link>
<guid>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=384575</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<P>we just bill them under fundus photos currently...not sure of any other billing code for them right now</P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>
<P>Heather</P>]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 17:22:26 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=385171</link>
<guid>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=385171</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<P>I just put revenue folks on the this issue. Should take a little time to get their take on it. When I hear back, I will resubmit their reply, </P>
<P>Thanks for that update on the 92499!</P>
<P>Gary</P>]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 12:42:35 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=386663</link>
<guid>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=386663</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<P>HI all,</P>
<P>We have been fighting the good fight about billing for FAF here at Moran, and to settle the issue, I contacted the coding specialist at AAO.</P>
<P>You can bill for FAF using 92250, you can use the modifier if you choose.&nbsp; There is no restriction on what instrument is being used - fundus camera or SLO</P>
<P>BUT fundus imaging &nbsp;is still bundled to OCT, so if you are doing OCT as well, or any other kind of fundus imaging (not angioraphy of course), you will only be reimbursed for one procedure.</P>
<P>We have a retinal specialist here who asks for so many kinds of imaging, we refer to it as Dr. X stew... HD OCT, FAF, IR, FP, FA, ICG etc.......... but based on the report from the AAO expert, only half (three) of these procedures will be reimbursed.</P>
<P>If you are doing FAF without FP or OCT, you are good to go with 92250.</P>
<P>This is a good reminder that there is a finite amount of money in the Medicare coffers......</P>
<P>Save sight today,</P>
<P>P</P>]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 17:00:01 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=386671</link>
<guid>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=386671</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<P>Paula,</P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>
<P>This is great, very helpful info.</P>
<P>We have a couple of multiple imaging procedure ordering providers&nbsp;during single visits&nbsp;here too.</P>
<P>We "lovingly" refer to them as "Home Runs" or "Grand Slams".</P>
<P>Thanks for posting.</P>
<P>bob</P>]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 17:05:56 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
