
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>Haag-Streit Stool Model 548</title>
<link>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=465042</link>
<description></description>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 15:52:31 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 21:04:48 GMT</pubDate>
<copyright>Copyright &#xA9; 2012 Ophthalmic Photographers&apos; Society</copyright>
<atom:link href="https://www.opsweb.org/forums/topic_rss.asp?id=465042" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link>
<item>
<title>Haag-Streit Stool Model 548</title>
<link>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=465042</link>
<guid>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=465042</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Does anybody have experience using this stool? &nbsp;I like that it has a wide square bottom and a foot pedal for us to raise/lower the patient once they are seated. &nbsp;I haven't used one before. &nbsp;Any thoughts out there on this stool or others that are great for patients at imaging devices?&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;Thanks!</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Sarah</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 17:06:04 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=465051</link>
<guid>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=465051</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<P>Not this stool in particularl, we use the Reliance model, but large square seat with hydraulic foot pedal to raise and lwoer patients.</P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>
<P>1000K a stool, but WORTH EVERY Penny, when you have large patient's, unstable patient's, and one's you'd rather not lift out of a chair and back on again just to raise or lower it.&nbsp;&nbsp; </P>
<P>This is all we use at the ODC.&nbsp; I wouldn't put my mother in any other chair, why a patient?&nbsp; It's a comfort and safety issue.&nbsp; Mid stream angiography I don't want a large 93 year old man ( or woman) falling out of a chair!</P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>
<P>Denice</P>]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 17:13:54 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title> Haag-Streit Stool Model 548</title>
<link>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=465052</link>
<guid>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=465052</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Sarah,</p><p>Only draw back is the stool doesn't lock in place so if the patient on sitting, the chair can roll about. I believe you can lock the chair seat from rotating in a circle. Always get the waterfall bottom for sitting on.</p><p>Tom Steele&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><br></p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 17:14:48 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=465062</link>
<guid>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=465062</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p>We use the Reliance 556 which has the same lockable wheeled base &amp; hydraulic lift. It has a round seat &amp; curved armrest that's helpful for some patients, but not other. The 548 looks better to me, but I don't think the 548 was available when we looked a few years back. The foot rest ring is held in place by spring clips and has a tendency to pop off. We broke several clips &amp; eventually just removed the ring. The fact that you can lock the base is a key feature and its a workhorse.</p><p>We love the Reliance 2000 Laser Chair for angiography, but its pretty expensive, so we only have one of those.</p><p>No financial interest...</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 17:20:03 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>RE:  Haag-Streit Stool Model 548</title>
<link>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=465067</link>
<guid>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=465067</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<div class="ForumQuote"><span style="font-weight: bold; ">T. Steele said:</span><br><p>Sarah,</p><p>Only draw back is the stool doesn't lock in place so if the patient on sitting, the chair can roll about. I believe you can lock the chair seat from rotating in a circle. Always get the waterfall bottom for sitting on.</p><p>Tom Steele&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><br></p></div><br>Tom, I think the lockable wheeled base is an option on all the 500 series chairs. ]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 17:22:16 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=465093</link>
<guid>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=465093</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<P>Sarah,</P>
<P>We use the same chairs Tim referenced, Reliance 556 with brakes. These are expensive but worth it. We have them for all our imaging devices in our department.</P>
<P>Let us know what you decide.</P>
<P>bob</P>]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 17:53:19 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=466572</link>
<guid>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=466572</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<P>Sarah</P>
<P>I used the same chairs as Bob and Tim.&nbsp; The lockable wheelbase is an OPTION that is worth the extra $$$.&nbsp; If you go with a Reliance be sure you get extra clips for the foot ring.&nbsp; As Tim mentioned, they are PLASTIC and snap easily if a larger pt tries to step down on what is only to be a foot "rest".&nbsp; That was quite a disappointment for the price.</P>
<P>Looking at the model you quote...i wonder if the "waterfall" seat would be a help or&nbsp;hinderance?&nbsp; With that raised lip at the front, i question if it would make it harder for pts to lean forward into the chin rest.&nbsp; I'd want to try it out before plunking down $1k+.&nbsp; </P>
<P>Lastly, we also had some of the 546 chairs in Boston, which is why we opted for the 556 when replacing.&nbsp; The single post back support over time will get bent into a very unsuportive reclined position.&nbsp; I'm sure a biomed department could throw it in a vise and straighten it.&nbsp; But the wraparound back on the 556 also adjusts for pts of excessive or diminutive "girth".</P>
<P>more than .02</P>
<P>j-</P>]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 22:04:48 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
