
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>FDA approval of 25% fluorescein sodium</title>
<link>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=519097</link>
<description></description>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 10:05:25 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 17:42:56 GMT</pubDate>
<copyright>Copyright &#xA9; 2013 Ophthalmic Photographers&apos; Society</copyright>
<atom:link href="https://www.opsweb.org/forums/topic_rss.asp?id=519097" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link>
<item>
<title>FDA approval of 25% fluorescein sodium</title>
<link>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=519097</link>
<guid>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=519097</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<P>HI&nbsp; OPS,</P>
<P>A colleague has asked about the FDA approval status on 25% fluorescein sodium... this imager had heard that not all 25% fluorescein has that approval, and her group will not purchase 25% until it has been attained.</P>
<P>This is an issue I am not aware of, and I am wondering if someone can enlighten me / us?&nbsp; We do not use 25% at our institution, so I admit I&nbsp;am completely in the dark and can't help my colleague with a useful answer.&nbsp; Any information will be greatly appreciated!</P>
<P>Thanks and looking forward to learning more,</P>
<P>Paula</P>]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 9 Jan 2013 19:41:23 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=519104</link>
<guid>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=519104</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi</p><p>It seems to be listed on the FDA website of Approved Drug Products.</p><p>Says that AK-FLUOR 25% was approved in 2008.</p><p>If you go to the link below and type "Sodium Fluorescein" in the search field you can explore the results.</p><p>http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/drugsatfda/index.cfm</p><p>Leslie</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 9 Jan 2013 19:53:56 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=519228</link>
<guid>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=519228</guid>
<description><![CDATA[I visited the FDA website, and, indeed, AKORN 25% sodium fluorescein is approved.&nbsp; Several years ago, we had increased nausea and vomitting with AKORN's 25% sodium fluorescein, so we stopped ordering from AKORN.&nbsp; To my knowlege, no other "brand" is FDA approved for the 25%.&nbsp; Would those who use AKORN 25% comment on their experience?&nbsp; Thanks!]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 9 Jan 2013 23:48:27 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=519474</link>
<guid>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=519474</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This was the first hit on Google search for "FDA approval of sodium fluorescein".&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/EnforcementActivitiesbyFDA/SelectedEnforcementActionsonUnapprovedDrugs/ucm280534.htm" target="_blank">http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/EnforcementActivitiesbyFDA/SelectedEnforcementActionsonUnapprovedDrugs/ucm280534.htm</a></p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 14:37:26 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=519566</link>
<guid>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=519566</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<P>We use 10% but about 5 years ago we had&nbsp;two of dye lots&nbsp; that seemed to trigger a higher incidence of nausea.&nbsp; Our institution has a pharmacy co-op which dictates our supplies&nbsp;so we were compelled to stay with the same vendor .&nbsp; They replaced the boxewe returned to them and we had no more trouble.</P>
<P>Years ago, (and I mean back in the 70s and 80s),&nbsp;there was speculation that dye impurities were the culprit in nausea, but with all the care that is used now, that doesn't seem a reasonable explanation.</P>
<P>Is there a chemist or physiologist out there that can discuss if there are true differences in dye lots that trigger nausea, or is it just coincidental?</P>
<P>Just wonderin'.&nbsp; Thanks for the feedback,</P>
<P>Paula</P>]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 17:32:53 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=519577</link>
<guid>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=519577</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Paula,</p><p>Check out:&nbsp;Eutick M. Sodium fluorescein – colourful past, 
bright future. J Ophthalmic Photography 28:66-70, 2006</p><p>If I get a chance later today, I'll dig up the PDF and post a link for those that don't have a hard copy of the JOP handy.</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 17:45:12 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=519607</link>
<guid>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=519607</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.opsweb.org/resource/resmgr/jop_references/28-2-05.pdf" target="_blank">Here's the link</a>.</p><p>You can also find it in the reference list of <a href="https://www.opsweb.org/?page=FA">Fluorescein Fundamentals</a> here on the site.</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 18:02:48 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=519618</link>
<guid>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=519618</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Thanks, Tim]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 18:22:37 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=519634</link>
<guid>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=519634</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<P>Yep&nbsp; - Mal Eutick's paper explains it all... not as many purification processes as&nbsp;I would have thought.&nbsp; Fluorescein sodium is still a good tool.</P>
<P>Mal presented a paper on this topic at the 2002 ICOP in Adelaide after colleagues in OZ experienced a significant incidence of adverse effects.&nbsp; Angela Chappell and Anton Drew were key in recruiting him to talk at the ICOP conference.&nbsp; He and his company really took ownershp of the problem and worked to find the answer.</P>
<P>What an interesting, engaging guy he is!</P>]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 18:42:56 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
