
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>Optovue OCT vs Cirrus OCT </title>
<link>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=525106</link>
<description></description>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 18:08:40 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 16:48:11 GMT</pubDate>
<copyright>Copyright &#xA9; 2013 Ophthalmic Photographers&apos; Society</copyright>
<atom:link href="https://www.opsweb.org/forums/topic_rss.asp?id=525106" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link>
<item>
<title>Optovue OCT vs Cirrus OCT </title>
<link>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=525106</link>
<guid>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=525106</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone had the occasion to use both the Cirrus OCT and the Optovue OCT within a retina practice setting, having used both machines on the same patient population. If so, could you please give an opinion on the following question.</p><p>I am a newbie as it were to the Optovue OCT. I have found it to provide very good results and it is really pretty easy to use. However, as for a small percentage of the retina patient population, I find it to be really inadequate in comparison to the Cirrus OCT. It seems that in patients with any type of corneal changes, hazy and/or narrow capsules s/p cat.surgery and even some moderate to severe cataract patients, the quality of scan really pales in the comparison. I have had patients with some of these conditions that I could easily get a quality scan of 7's, 8's, and 9's on the Cirrus but I really struggle to get a scan that is of ay use.</p><p>&nbsp;Any thoughts?</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Thanks,</p><p>Jim<br></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p></p><p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 17:48:11 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
