
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>FAF Comparison</title>
<link>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=706769</link>
<description></description>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 4 Jun 2026 06:41:33 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Fri, 7 Feb 2014 21:32:57 GMT</pubDate>
<copyright>Copyright &#xA9; 2014 Ophthalmic Photographers&apos; Society</copyright>
<atom:link href="https://www.opsweb.org/forums/topic_rss.asp?id=706769" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link>
<item>
<title>FAF Comparison</title>
<link>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=706769</link>
<guid>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=706769</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I have a past resident asking me to compare the Fundus Autofluorescence images from the Zeiss Visucam NM/FA and the Heidelberg. &nbsp;I don't have experience with the Visucam's FAF images. &nbsp;Can anyone give me their impressions on this system? &nbsp;Are you able to use measurements and track over time?</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Thanks,</p><p>Sarah</p><p>smoyer@gmail.com</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 6 Feb 2014 22:51:46 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=706850</link>
<guid>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=706850</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Sarah,

We have a Zeiss NM/FA at one of our satellites.

I can schedule some time there next week and do some comps if you'd like.

bob]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 7 Feb 2014 03:00:53 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=707223</link>
<guid>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=707223</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Bob- &nbsp;That'd be great! &nbsp;Make sure you have the rev2 unit with "modern FAF".]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 7 Feb 2014 22:32:57 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
