
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>Topcon 50DX Focusing Question</title>
<link>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=707293</link>
<description></description>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 4 Jun 2026 06:34:57 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2014 17:47:17 GMT</pubDate>
<copyright>Copyright &#xA9; 2014 Ophthalmic Photographers&apos; Society</copyright>
<atom:link href="https://www.opsweb.org/forums/topic_rss.asp?id=707293" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link>
<item>
<title>Topcon 50DX Focusing Question</title>
<link>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=707293</link>
<guid>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=707293</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p><br></p><p>Which direction do you turn the focusing Knob for &nbsp;the Inner Retina ( closer to the camera) as oppose</p><p>to the Choroid ( farther from the camera ).</p><p>Thanks</p><p>Bill</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Sat, 8 Feb 2014 01:54:28 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>RE: Topcon 50DX Focusing Question</title>
<link>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=707385</link>
<guid>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=707385</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<div class="ForumQuote"><span style="font-weight: bold;">W. Busch said:</span><br><p><br></p><p>Which direction do you turn the focusing Knob for &nbsp;the Inner Retina ( closer to the camera) as oppose</p><p>to the Choroid ( farther from the camera ).</p><p>Thanks</p><p>Bill</p></div><br><p>Hi Bill, </p><p>We have Zeiss 450 camera. When I notice the nerve are sharp while the macula is a little soft, I nudge the dial toward me. Therefore I would think the opposite would work in your case. If you have a sharp mac and a soft nerve..... turn the dial away from you.</p><p>Gary</p><p><br></p> ]]></description>
<pubDate>Sat, 8 Feb 2014 11:26:47 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=707436</link>
<guid>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=707436</guid>
<description><![CDATA[
		
	
	
		<div class="section">
			<div class="section">Gary,&nbsp;</div><div class="section"><br></div><div class="section">Thanks for the quick response. My first post.&nbsp;</div><div class="section"><br></div><div class="section">So given the example below starting in the ( Vitreous )&nbsp;<span style="font-weight: bold; ">First set --&gt;&nbsp;</span><span style="font-family: Arial; ">and focusing towards</span><span style="font-weight: bold; ">--&gt;</span>&nbsp;<span style="font-family: Arial; "><span style="font-weight: bold; ">Fifth set </span><span style="font-weight: bold; ">(</span>Choroid ) would mean turning the Focusing Knob away from me?</span></div><div class="section"><br></div><div class="section">You said<span style="font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; font-family: Arial; "> nudge</span> the Knob . How much of a turn would it take from First set to Fifth set?</div><div class="section">&nbsp;</div><div class="section">As you can probably tell , i'm having a hard time mastering focusing the fundus camera.</div><div class="section">&nbsp;</div><div class="section">Any other focusing tips you could share would be appreciated .</div><div class="section">&nbsp;</div><div class="section">Thanks&nbsp;</div><div class="section">Bill</div><div class="section"><br></div>
			<div class="layoutArea">
				<div class="column">
					<p><span style="font-size: 8.000000pt; font-family: 'Arial'; font-weight: 700">Figure 9: </span><span style="font-size: 8pt; font-family: ArialMT; ">Clinical examples of focusing on
different levels of the retina are shown in
these stereo pairs. From the top </span><span style="font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; font-family: Arial; ">First set</span><span style="font-size: 8pt; font-family: ArialMT; ">—
Focusing the fundus camera in the vitreous
allows the ophthalmic photographer to docu-
ment various opacities. Second set—The
flame-shaped hemorrhages found in the inner
retina are in sharp focus in this photograph.
Third set—The avascular zone surrounding
the fovea may be best appreciated when the
central portion of the retina is the object of
focus. Fourth set—The outer retina has been
focused on for this stereo pair of a young girl's
bull's eye maculapathy. </span><span style="font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; font-family: Arial; ">Fifth set</span><span style="font-size: 8pt; font-family: ArialMT; ">—Maximum
information at the level of the choroid is
achieved through the use of a red (650 nanom-
eter) filter and careful focusing on the choroi-
dal nevus.&nbsp;</span></p>
				</div>
			</div>
		</div>]]></description>
<pubDate>Sat, 8 Feb 2014 16:13:31 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>RE: </title>
<link>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=707473</link>
<guid>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=707473</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<div class="ForumQuote"><span style="font-weight: bold;">W. Busch said:</span><br>
		
	
	
		<div class="section">
			<div class="section">Gary,&nbsp;</div><div class="section"><br></div><div class="section">Thanks for the quick response. My first post.&nbsp;</div><div class="section"><br></div><div class="section">So given the example below starting in the ( Vitreous )&nbsp;<span style="font-weight: bold; ">First set --&gt;&nbsp;</span><span style="font-family: Arial; ">and focusing towards</span><span style="font-weight: bold; ">--&gt;</span>&nbsp;<span style="font-family: Arial; "><span style="font-weight: bold; ">Fifth set </span><span style="font-weight: bold; ">(</span>Choroid ) would mean turning the Focusing Knob away from me?</span></div><div class="section"><br></div><div class="section">You said<span style="font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; font-family: Arial; "> nudge</span> the Knob . How much of a turn would it take from First set to Fifth set?</div><div class="section">&nbsp;</div><div class="section">As you can probably tell , i'm having a hard time mastering focusing the fundus camera.</div><div class="section">&nbsp;</div><div class="section">Any other focusing tips you could share would be appreciated .</div><div class="section">&nbsp;</div><div class="section">Thanks&nbsp;</div><div class="section">Bill</div><div class="section"><br></div>
			<div class="layoutArea">
				<div class="column">
					<p><span style="font-size: 8.000000pt; font-family: 'Arial'; font-weight: 700">Figure 9: </span><span style="font-size: 8pt; font-family: ArialMT; ">Clinical examples of focusing on
different levels of the retina are shown in
these stereo pairs. From the top </span><span style="font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; font-family: Arial; ">First set</span><span style="font-size: 8pt; font-family: ArialMT; ">—
Focusing the fundus camera in the vitreous
allows the ophthalmic photographer to docu-
ment various opacities. Second set—The
flame-shaped hemorrhages found in the inner
retina are in sharp focus in this photograph.
Third set—The avascular zone surrounding
the fovea may be best appreciated when the
central portion of the retina is the object of
focus. Fourth set—The outer retina has been
focused on for this stereo pair of a young girl's
bull's eye maculapathy. </span><span style="font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; font-family: Arial; ">Fifth set</span><span style="font-size: 8pt; font-family: ArialMT; ">—Maximum
information at the level of the choroid is
achieved through the use of a red (650 nanom-
eter) filter and careful focusing on the choroi-
dal nevus.&nbsp;</span></p>
				</div>
			</div>
		</div></div><p>&nbsp;</p><p>First time poster! Welcome, Bill!!</p><p>Your original post lead me to believe you were talking minor changes in your focusing, since that is where most of MY issues are. I don't feel I could tell you how MUCH to turn your focus dial, that depends on how much of a difference there is in the layers you are capturing. The "nudge" I mentioned was for a tweaking retinal layer focus. Sort of like what they are saying in 2nd - 4th set. These focusing differences will be very slight.</p><p>Compare those layers to the vitreous (first set) where you'll be turning your focus dial more in order to bring the camera's plane of focus forward in the eye. We had an interesting patient just yesterday who had a huge retinal detachment. Imagine looking into the posterior pole and seeing nothing but wrinkled up tissue. Even with the focus racked out to the maximum position and I still couldn't get the closer part of that detachment in focus.</p><p>Once you get really accustomed to your fundus camera, it should be second nature as to which way and how far to turn your focus knob.</p><p>Gary</p><p><br></p><p><br></p><br> ]]></description>
<pubDate>Sat, 8 Feb 2014 18:04:00 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=709056</link>
<guid>https://www.opsweb.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=709056</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Thanks Gary,
Actually minor focusing differences is what I was getting at. I get a pretty good photo most of the time. Just not always happy with the focus.  When I go to adjust it I often times make it worse. Now that I know to get the focus deeper just need to nudge the knob away from me a tiny bit and that you stated between step  2 and step 4  is small amountI have a good starting point to tweak what I see on screen. Used to old 4x5 view cameras so starting to see similarities while focusing. Mounted clear ground glass in old 4x5 and put lines on the glass.  Same direction for focus and very close to focusing distance.
Thanks again for the help ;-) ]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2014 18:47:17 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
